Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 2: Trauma and Resilience

How do we combat the normalization of violence?

When we grapple with the normalization of violence, we know that often people's diminished sense of the seriousness of harm (and therefore their willingness to commit it) follows their experience of surviving it.That surviving violence often makes people take it less seriously be surprising to some. But when we think about masculinity, about whose victimization we are socialized to value, and about adolescent development, ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

Family wellness

Can child wellness be achieved if parental wellness is lacking? What are promising practices in two-generation approaches to better mental and physical health?

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 2: Trauma and Resilience

The Impact of Family Engagement on Trauma & Resilience

The missing dynamic in forming strength-based approaches in many of the family-serving systems in our state include family education, empowerment and engagement. It is quite evident that when families are educated, empowered and engaged, they become active participants in the process of healing, and improving the overall health and wel lbeing of their families. The common thread of families lack of access to appropriate ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

Is health one?

Are we ready to do away with distinctions between “mental” and “physical” health? Why and why not?

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 2: Trauma and Resilience

socio-economic factors

Regarding socio-economic disparities, in order to ensure that resources are reaching *all* children in need, education across the board is crucial. William Penn Fdn has funded programs to address this in the age 0-3 cohort; but education is needed for children, families, teachers in the K-8 and high-school levels as well, where negative behaviors tend to manifest and lead to disciplinary challenges. Teachers often comment ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 3: Fragile Families

Are long-term solutions and remediation the best we can do for today's children?

This study makes clear the damage done to child development and lifelong well-being to black families in disadvantaged neighborhoods where their exposure to community violence is shockingly high. Remedial or long term changes in communities are important, but the window to help kids during their critical early years is short. The evidence tells us we need to add an urgent focus on preventing or stopping stopping harmful ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 3: Fragile Families

What examples are there of models, programs or strategies that already are breaking down these silos

The Academy on Violence and Abuse (www.avahealth.org) is an interdisciplinary, non-profit professional organization that brings together experts in the health impacts of violence and abuse from across disciplines and settings. This collaborative, research-focused group was created to address the concerns highlighted in a 2002 report released by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) regarding the health impact of violence and ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

Senior ADviser for Program Development

The report suggests that to separarte mental and physical wellness is artificial and can be harmful. Are there examples of how organizations or systems have overcome structural and financial barriers to providing integrated and holistic care that builds resilience in children and their families?

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

Is this really a shift from illness to promotion of wellness?

The point is that mental health policy needs to effectively develop a full intervention continuum: (1) promotion of mental health, (2) a focus on prevention of MH related problems, (3) a focus on responding as early after the onset of problems as is feasible, and (4) enhanced systems of care. It also needs to encompass a sophisticated approach to the role of schools. It is especially essential not to present wellness ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

Build on the Success of School Based Health Centers

One of the most effective models for integrating physical and mental health within the school environment is School Based Health Centers (SBHCs). SBHCs remove barriers to care, mitigate the stigma associated with mental health treatment for many students and families, and create a safe haven for children and adolescents. SBHCs have been shown to support young people, improve their health, and increase their academic success. ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

School-Based Health Centers are integral to achieving Wellness!

School-Based Health Centers can be the link among several report recommendations to achieve wellness in children and youth. SBHCs increase access to integrated health services, support families and students through universal wellness programs and direct mental health services, and influence school climate through teaching trainings, social-emotional learning programs, and youth-led stigma reduction campaigns. In order ...more »

Submitted by

Campaign: Policy Brief Discussion 1: Are the Children Well?

how does one make this happen?

My concern about this report is not the content, which is basically what many of us have written at one time or another (and it's perfectly good). It's the challenge, in these times, of making grand recommendations. For some time, I have written about the urgency of state and community level dialogue and engagement. Working with schools, with community groups, with state advocacy groups...this is where we must focus...our ...more »

Submitted by